Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Anesthesiology, 6(103), p. 1268-1295, 2005

DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200512000-00024

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Anesthesiology, 6(103), p. 1268-1295

DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200512010-00024

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Sleep, Anesthesiology, and the Neurobiology of Arousal State Control

Journal article published in 2005 by Ralph Lydic ORCID, David C Warltier, Helen A. Baghdoyan ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Sleep, like breathing, is a biologic rhythm that is actively generated by the brain. Neuronal networks that have evolved to regulate naturally occurring sleep preferentially modulate traits that define states of sedation and anesthesia. Sleep is temporally organized into distinct stages that are characterized by a unique constellation of physiologic and behavioral traits. Sleep and anesthetic susceptibility are genetically modulated, heritable phenotypes. This review considers 40 yr of research regarding the cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to arousal state control. Clinical and preclinical data have debunked and supplanted the primitive view that sleep need is a weakness. Sleep deprivation and restriction diminish vigilance, alter neuroendocrine control, and negatively impact immune function. There is overwhelming support for the view that decrements in vigilance can negatively impact performance. Advances in neuroscience provide a foundation for the sea change in public and legal perspectives that now regard a sleep-deprived individual as impaired.