Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, The Journal of Nutrition, 4(130), p. 784-791, 2000

DOI: 10.1093/jn/130.4.784

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Distribution of protein turnover changes with age in humans as assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance image analysis to quantify tissue volumes

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that nonmuscle lean tissue mass and its rate of protein catabolism remain constant with aging despite changes in the proportional contribution of these tissues to whole-body protein metabolism. Whole-body protein kinetics, using the 60-h oral [(15) N]glycine method, and muscle and nonmuscle protein catabolism, based on protein kinetic data, urinary N(tau)-methylhistine excretion and lean tissue volumes defined by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging, from eight healthy elderly subjects (5 females and 3 males, mean age 71.5 y) were compared with those of seven young persons (3 females and 4 males, mean age 28 y). There were no significant age or gender effects on rates of protein kinetics per L total lean tissue. There was a lower (P < 0.004) rate of muscle protein catabolism in the elderly (1.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.1 g. L(-1). d(-1)) and a trend (P = 0.08) for lower muscle volume (19.7 +/- 1.5 vs. 25.0 +/- 2.4 L). This contrasted with intraabdominal lean tissue, where the rate of protein catabolism (13. 8 +/- 0.6 vs. 13.2 +/- 0.9 g. L(-1 ). d(-1)) and volume (7.5 +/- 0.3 vs 8.0 +/- 0.5 L) did not differ between age groups. Thus, the decrease in the contribution by muscle to whole-body protein metabolism with age is associated with an increase from 62 to 74% (P < 0.001) in the contribution by nonmuscle lean tissues. These findings have potential implications for the nutrition of both normal and sick elderly persons.