During the oceanographic campaign CARPET2014, between 30 January and 4 February 2014, a total of 478 microstructure profiles (grouped into 145 ensembles) and 38 CTD casts were made in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea) under moderate wind forcing (average wind speed 10 m s -1 ) and heat fluxes (net negative heat flux in the range of 150 to 400 W m -2 ). Among the collected profiles, there were three sets of yoyo casts, each lasting for about 12 h for a total of 50 casts. Overall, these represent the first turbulence observations collected in the Gulf of Trieste. Microstructure profiles collected with a free-falling profiler must be taken in enables of repeated casts, with the objective of obtaining more statistically significant values for turbulence parameters. This approach is certainly feasible in shallow waters, but has a down side when the vertical density structure includes strong interfaces that can move up or down between subsequent casts, under the influence of tides and internal waves. In order to minimize the smearing effect of such interfacial displacements on mean quantities, we developed an algorithm to realign, according to the temperature profile, successive microstructure profiles to produce sharper and more meaningful mean profiles of measured turbulence parameters. During CARPET2014, the water column in the Gulf evolved from a well-mixed condition to a stratified one, due to Adriatic waters intruding at the bottom along the Gulf's south-eastern coast. These waters stratified the water column and changed its stability characteristics, which in turn prevented wind driven turbulence from penetrating to the bottom of the water column. In this study, we show that during a warm and relatively dry winter, such as in 2014, the Gulf of Trieste was not completely mixed because of the influence of bottom waters intruding from the open sea, even under moderate wind forcing. Inside the Gulf, two types of water intrusions from the Adriatic Sea were observed during the yoyo casts: one coming from its northern coast (i.e. warmer, saltier and more turbid) and one coming from the open sea in front of the Po Delta (i.e. cooler, fresher and less turbid). Those two intrusions behaved similarly but had a different impact on turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate profiles. The former, with high turbidity, acted as a barrier to wind-driven turbulence, while the latter, with low sediment concentrations and a smaller density gradient when compared to the rest of the water column, was not able to suppress downward penetration of turbulence from the surface to the same degree.