Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Talanta, 4(72), p. 1552-1563

DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.02.019

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Characterization of the aromatic profile for the authentication and differentiation of typical Italian dry-sausages

Journal article published in 2007 by F. Bianchi, C. Cantoni, M. Careri ORCID, L. Chiesa, M. Musci, A. Pinna
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In order to chacterize two kinds of typical Italian dry-sausages, namely "Salame Mantovano" and "Salame Cremonese", the volatile composition was determined for seven samples of "Salame Mantovano" and for five samples of "Salame Cremonese". The study was performed by the dynamic headspace extraction technique (DHS) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Among the 104 volatiles identified, terpenes, aldehydes, ketones and alcohols represented the most abundant compounds. Peak area data for all the substances from the above mentioned group was used for statistical purposes. Firstly, principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out in order to visualize data trends and to detect possible clusters within samples. Then, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was performed in order to detect the volatile compounds able to differentiate the two kinds of sausages investigated. The data obtained by GC-MS shows that the most important contributions to the differentiation of the two kinds of typical Italian salami were seven volatile compounds, i.e. 3-methylbutanal, 6-camphenol, dimethyl disulfide, 1-propene-3,3'-thiobis, ethyl propanoate, 1,4-p-menthadiene and 2,6-dimethyl-1,3,5,7-octatetraene. Prediction ability of the calculated model was estimated to be 100% by the "leave-one-out" cross-validation.