Published in

Elsevier, Journal of Microbiological Methods, 3(54), p. 339-351

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7012(03)00067-8

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Distinguishing plant and fungal sequences in ESTs from infected plant tissues

Journal article published in 2003 by Tom Hsiang ORCID, Paul H. Goodwin
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from fungal-infected plant tissues are composed of a mixture of plant and fungal sequences. Using freely available software and tools, a novel procedure is described for distinguishing plant and fungal DNA sequences. Although the GenBank non-redundant (NR) database is larger and therefore one would presume that BLASTX analysis of it would be more accurate, superior resolution of 700 randomly selected fungal ESTs was found with Standalone TBLASTX analyses with a local matching database composed of a plant and a fungal genome. Standalone TBLASTX analyses of 3,983 ESTs from nine different fungal-infected plant EST libraries also proved to be superior in identifying the origin of sequences as either plant or fungal compared to GenBank BLASTX analysis. Standalone TBLASTX with a matching database comprised of a single plant and a single fungal genome appears to be a faster and more accurate method than BLASTX searches of the GenBank non-redundant database to distinguish fungal and plant sequences in mixed EST collections.