Published in

BioMed Central, BioMedical Engineering OnLine, S2(14), 2015

DOI: 10.1186/1475-925x-14-s2-s2

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: A comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: A comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders ; DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-14-S2-S2 URL: http://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-925X-14-S2-S2 Filiació URV: SI ; Background: Digital image (DI) analysis avoids visual subjectivity in interpreting immunohistochemical stains and provides more reproducible results. An automated procedure consisting of two variant methods for quantifying the cytokeratin-19 (CK19) marker in breast cancer tissues is presented. Methods: The first method (A) excludes the holes inside selected CK19 stained areas, and the second (B) includes them. 93 DIs scanned from complete cylinders of tissue microarrays were evaluated visually by two pathologists and by the automated procedures. Results and conclusions: There was good concordance between the two automated methods, both of which tended to identify a smaller CK19-positive area than did the pathologists. The results obtained with method B were more similar to those of the pathologists; probably because it takes into account the entire positive tumoural area, including the holes. However, the pathologists overestimated the positive area of CK19. Further studies are needed to confirm the utility of this automated procedure in prognostic studies.