Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Psychological Association, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4(26), p. 929-944

DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.929

American Psychological Association, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4(26), p. 929-944

DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.929

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Surface Segmentation Cues Influence Negative Priming for Novel and Familiar Shapes

Journal article published in 2000 by Fani Loula, Z. Kourtzi ORCID, Zoe Koutzi, Maggie Shiffrar
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In a series of experiments, a negative priming paradigm was used to determine how the visual system represents novel shapes under conditions of inattention. Observers in a shape-matching task viewed overlapping shapes with or without surface segmentation cues. Positive priming occurred with opaque and transparent surface-like shapes, whereas negative priming was found with outlined and transparent shapes that lacked surface segmentation cues. This effect generalized to familiar shapes. These results support the importance of segmentation cues in negative priming and suggest that, under otherwise identical conditions, surface segmentation processes can determine whether positive or negative priming occurs in an implicit memory task. Thus, selective attention for overlapping shapes may be best understood in relation to surface segmentation processes.