Published in

Elsevier, The Spine Journal, 3(13), p. 352-362, 2013

DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.005

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The effects of microenvironment in mesenchymal stem cell-based regeneration of intervertebral disc

Journal article published in 2013 by Yong-Can Huang, Victor Y. L. Leung, William W. Lu ORCID, Keith D. K. Luk
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Recent studies have demonstrated new therapeutic strategy using transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), especially bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs), to preserve intervertebral disc (IVD) structure and functions. It is important to understand whether and how the MSCs survive and thrive in the hostile microenvironment of the degenerated IVD. Therefore, this review majorly examines how resident disc cells, hypoxia, low nutrition, acidic pH, mechanical loading, endogenous proteinases, and cytokines regulate the behavior of the exogenous MSCs. PURPOSE: To review and summarize the effect of the microenvironment in biological characteristics of BM-MSCs for IVD regeneration; the presence of endogenous stem cells and the state of the art in the use of BM-MSCs to regenerate the IVD in vivo were also discussed. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. METHODS: MEDLINE electronic database was used to search for articles concerning stem/progenitor cell isolation from the IVD, regulation of the components of microenvironment for MSCs, and MSC-based therapy for IVD degeneration. The search was limited to English language. RESULTS: Stem cells are probably resident in the disc, but exogenous stem cells, especially BM-MSCs, are currently the most popular graft cells for IVD regeneration. The endogenous disc cells and the biochemical and biophysical components in the degenerating disc present a complicated microenvironment to regulate the transplanted BM-MSCs. Although MSCs regenerate the mildly degenerative disc effectively in the experimental and clinical trials, many underlying questions are in need of further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a dramatic improvement in the understanding of potential MSC-based therapy for IVD regeneration. The use of MSCs for IVD degeneration is still at the stage of preclinical and Phase 1 studies. The effects of the disc microenvironment in MSCs survival and function should be closely studied for transferring MSC transplantation from bench to bedside successfully.