Published in

European Geosciences Union, Geoscientific Model Development, 1(6), p. 45-55, 2013

DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-45-2013

Copernicus Publications, Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 3(5), p. 2259-2288

DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-5-2259-2012

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Quantifying the model structural error in carbon cycle data assimilation systems

Journal article published in 2012 by S. Kuppel ORCID, F. Chevallier ORCID, P. Peylin
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract. This study explores the impact of the structural error of biosphere models when assimilating net ecosystem exchange (NEE) measurements or CO2 concentration measurements to optimise uncertain model parameters within carbon cycle data assimilation systems (CCDASs). This error has been proven difficult to identify and is often neglected in the total uncertainty budget. We propose a simple method which is derived from the model-minus-observation mismatch statistics. This diagnosis is applied to a state-of-the-art biogeochemical model using measurements of the net surface CO2 flux at twelve sites located in temperate, deciduous, broadleaf forests. We find that the structural model error in the NEE space has a standard deviation of 1.5 to 1.7 gC m−2 d−1, without a significant correlation structure beyond the lag of a few days, and a large spatial structure that can be approximated with an exponential decay of e-folding length of 500 km. In the space of concentrations, its characteristics are commensurate with the transport errors, both for surface air sample measurements and total column measurements. The inferred characteristics are confirmed by complementary optimality diagnostics performed after site-scale parameter optimisations.