Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 6(28), p. 1688-1696, 2014

DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000314

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Pacing Strategy Determinants During a 10-km Running Time Trial

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to identify the main determinants of the self-selected pacing strategy during a 10-km running time-trial. Twenty eight male long-distance runners performed the following tests: a) maximal incremental treadmill test, b) economy running test, c) maximum dynamic strength test, and d) 10-km running time-trial on an outdoor track. A stepwise multiple regression model was used to identify the contribution of rating of perceived exertion (RPE), physiological, and muscular parameters on the pacing strategy adopted by athletes. In the start phase (first 400m), RPE accounted for 72% (P=0.001) of the pacing variance. Peak treadmill speed measured during a maximal incremental test explained 52% (P=0.001) of the pacing variance during the middle phase (400 to 9600 m), while maximal oxygen uptake and maximum dynamic strength accounted for additional 23% (P=0.002) and 5% (P=0.003), respectively. In the end phase (last 400m), peak treadmill speed accounted alone for 66% (P=0.003) of the pacing variance. These data suggest that predictors of the pacing strategy during a 10-km running time-trial have a transitional behavior from perceptive (start phase) to muscular and physiological factors (middle and end phases).