Published in

Taylor and Francis Group, Addiction Research and Theory, 6(16), p. 607-617

DOI: 10.1080/16066350801911948

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

An examination of the quality of life among rural and outer metropolitan injecting drug users in NSW, Australia

Journal article published in 2008 by Elizabeth Conroy, Jo Kimber, Kate Dolan ORCID, Carolyn Day
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This article aims to explore the relationship between quality of life (QOL) and health-related behaviours among rural and metropolitan injecting drug users (IDU) using a new scale developed specifically for use with IDU.One-hundred and sixty-four rural and 96 metropolitan IDU from seven different NSW Area Health Services were interviewed using a cross-sectional survey, including the Injection Drug Use Quality of Life (IDUQOL) scale. The mean domain-based IDUQOL score was 59.4 (SD 22.3). The life areas most commonly selected by participants as important in determining their QOL were family, health, money, housing and partnerships. Rural participants were less likely to choose housing compared to those from the metropolitan areas, but were more likely to select independence. Rural participants also gave a lower mean rating to money (33.1 vs. 47.0) and to partnerships (53.8 vs. 71.1), suggesting differences in the composition of QOL among rural and metropolitan IDU. Compared to metropolitan participants, rural participants had a lower domain-based QOL score (56.1 vs. 64.5). No association was found between QOL and health-related behaviours such as drug use or sexual and injecting practices. IDU subjective assessment of QOL is mediated by a range of factors. Disparity between rural and metropolitan IDU appears to be influenced by non-health related areas such as partnerships and money, highlighting the need for a more holistic approach to the management of substance use problems.