Published in

Mary Ann Liebert, Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 4(4), p. 473-480

DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2007.0038

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Discriminating Between Strains ofEscherichia coliUsing Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and BOX-PCR

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated two biomolecular techniques for discriminating between strains of Escherichia coli isolated form a variety of sources. The DNA of 211 strains of E. coli collected from dairy farms, calves, feces, pigs, primates, humans, and food products was analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and repetitive-element polymerase chain reaction using the BOXA1 primer (BOX-PCR). Objectives of the present study were to compare PFGE and BOX-PCR for discriminating among strains of E. coli and investigate their capability in clustering E. coli strains according to the origin of bacterial isolation. Our results showed that PFGE and BOX-PCR were both able to distinguish closely related strains of E. coli; however, PFGE was able to discriminate between isolates indistinguishable by BOX-PCR and interpretation of PFGE data was easier. BOX-PCR proved to have good discrimination power, was less expensive, and could be performed in a PCR thermocycler. Neither of the methods used were effective in clustering E. coli strains according to the source of the organism.