Published in

Oxford University Press, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(11), p. 537-547, 2015

DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsv137

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Mismatch or allostatic load? Timing of life-adversity differentially shapes gray matter volume and anxious-temperament

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Traditionally, adversity was defined as the accumulation of environmental events (allostatic load). Recently however, a mismatch between the early and the later (adult) environment (mismatch) has been hypothesized to be critical for disease-development, a hypothesis that has not yet been tested explicitly in humans.We explored the impact of timing of life adversity (childhood and past year) on anxiety and depression levels (N=833) and brain morphology (N= 129).Both remote (childhood) and proximal (recent) adversities were differentially mirrored in morphometric changes in areas critically involved in emotional processing (i.e. amygdala/hippocampus, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex respectively). The effect of adversity on affect acted in an additive way with no evidence for interactions (mismatch). Structural equation modelling demonstrated a direct effect of adversity on morphometric estimates and anxiety/depression without evidence of brain morphology functioning as a mediator.Our results highlight that adversity manifests as pronounced changes in brain morphometric and affective temperament even though these seem to represent distinct mechanistic pathways. A major goal of future studies should be to define critical time periods for the impact of adversity and strategies for intervening to prevent or reverse the effects of adverse childhood life experiences.