Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, New Phytologist, 2(162), p. 397-411, 2004

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01025.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Does greater night‐time, rather than constant, warming alter growth of managed pasture under under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Summary • This study examined the effects of warming, elevated atmospheric CO2 and cutting regimen on the growth of Phalaris aquatica cv. Holdfast swards. • Six temperature gradient tunnels (TGT) were used to manipulate both air temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentrations (ambient and 750 ppm). Within each tunnel, there were three temperature treatments: no warming, constant warming of +3.0°C and a daytime warming of 2.2°C combined with a night-time warming of 4.0°C and two defoliation frequencies. • Averaged across 20 months of growth, there was a positive effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 (+11%), no effect of either warming treatment and a negative effect of frequent cutting (−19%) on total above ground biomass production. The responses to all treatments, however, were strongly seasonal. • Positive responses to CO2 were statistically significant only in the spring, when plant growth was strongest. No evidence was found that high night-time warming had different effects on plant growth and plant responses to elevated atmospheric CO2, than constant warming. ©New Phytologist (2004) doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01025.x