Developing ontologies to account for the complexity of biological systems requires the time intensive collaboration of many participants with expertise in various fields. While each participant may contribute to construct a list of terms for ontology development, no objective methods have been developed to evaluate how relevant each of these terms is to the intended domain. We have developed a computational method based on a hypergeometric enrichment test to evaluate the relevance of such terms to the intended domain. The proposed method uses the PubMed literature database to evaluate whether each potential term for ontology development is overrepresented in the abstracts that discuss the particular domain. This evaluation provides an objective approach to assess terms and prioritize them for ontology development.