Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Chemical Society, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 8(11), p. 3650-3660, 2015

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00463

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Handling Magnetic Coupling in Trinuclear Cu(II) Complexes

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The problem of deriving three different two-body magnetic couplings in three electrons/three centers in a general geometric arrangement is investigated using the trinuclear Cu(II) HAKKEJ complex as a real case example. In these systems, one quartet and two doublet low lying electronic states exist, which define the magnetic spectra. However, the two possible linearly independent energy differences do not provide enough information to extract the three magnetic coupling constants. Here, we show how to obtain these parameters without making any assumption on the symmetry of the system from a combination of density functional-and wave function-based calculations. The density functional calculations explore various broken symmetry solutions and relate the corresponding energy to the expectation value of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian. This allows one to obtain all magnetic couplings, although their magnitude strongly depends on the exchange−correlation functional. Interestingly, a constant ratio between the magnetic coupling constants along a series of investigated functionals is found. This provides an additional equation to be used when relying on energy differences between spin states, which in turn allow solving the Heisenberg spectrum. The magnetic couplings thus obtained are compared to the experiment. Implications for the appropriate interpretation of the experiment and for the study of more complex systems are discussed.