Published in

Cambridge University Press (CUP), Psychiatric Bulletin, 10(17), p. 612-614

DOI: 10.1192/pb.17.10.612

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Expectations of prospective senior registrars and those who appoint them

Journal article published in 1993 by Jon Izaguirre, Lester Sireling
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Access to a senior registrar post is growing more difficult because of increasing competition. The College Court of Electors and Joint Committee for High Psychiatric Training have agreed only two criteria for appointment as SR in Psychiatry (possession of MRCPsych and at least three years of general professional training), but, despite heavy workloads, busy timetables, and the need to prepare for the membership examination, clinical skills and dedication to patients will not ensure career progress if they are not accompanied by other aspects of training, sometimes with insufficient facilities and supervision. Indeed, Lewis (1991), after reviewing a group of applications for SR posts, found that the only variable which predicted likelihood of being shortlisted was having published: “Trainers generally believe that evidence of completed research and publications say more about a trainee than a good reference ever can”.