Published in

Elsevier, Ecological Engineering, (42), p. 249-255, 2012

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.02.017

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Dechlorination of hexachlorobenzene in treatment microcosm wetlands

Journal article published in 2012 by Yuanqing Zhou, Sirle Trestip, Xiuzhen Li, Marika Truu, Jaak Truu ORCID, Ülo Mander
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

There is little understanding of the pathways of hexachlorobenzene (HCB) removal in treatment wetlands. The aim of this research was to evaluate HCB dechlorination as affected by common reed (Phragmites australis) and broad-leaved cattail (Typha latifolia) applications in neutralized and enriched with nutrients peat with high, low and nil HCB concentration (300, 15, and 0 μg/g, respectively). After 10 weeks of the experiment, HCB removal was 49.4–67.2% in High-HCB peat, and 57.6–74.8% in Low-HCB peat. The mean removal of HCB was 53.5% in the unvegetated and 68.7% in the vegetated microcosm wetlands. The amount of HCB metabolites showed that dechlorination rates in Low-HCB microcosms were higher than in High-HCB microcosms, which were mainly attributed to the lower phytotoxicity and higher dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content than that of Low-HCB. Although HCB uptake by plants was <0.1% of the initial concentration, in both High-HCB and Low-HCB peats vegetated with Typha and Phragmites, enhanced HCB dechlorination rate was found. This was probably because the roots and its exudates enhanced dechlorination process. Microbial degradation was the predominating process in HCB removal. The following dechlorinated metabolites of HCB were detectable from the water, macrophytes and peat samples: PeCB, 1,2,3,4-, 1,2,3,5- and 1,2,4,5-TeCB, 1,2,3-, 1,2,4- and 1,3,5-TCB.