Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Chemical Society, Crystal Growth and Design, 7(15), p. 3417-3425, 2015

DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b00502

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Modulating Porosity through Conformer-Dependent Hydrogen Bonding in Copper(II) Coordination Polymers

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A new divergent ligand N,Nʹ-bis(4-carboxyphenylmethylene)ethane-1,2-diamine H4L1 has been prepared in high yield and used to generate two copper(II) coordination polymer materials poly¬-[Cu(H2L1)(OH2)]•H2O 1 and poly¬-[Cu(H2L1)(OH2)]•H2O•DMF 2. Both networks possess (4,4) sheet topologies and have almost identical compositions and coordination modes. The only major difference between the compounds lies with the conformation of the chelating ethylenediamine cores; compound 1 adopts a trans-(R,R/S,S) conformation, while compound 2 exhibits a cis-(R,S) conformation. This seemingly small difference arising from variation in synthetic conditions influences the extended structures of each network through hydrogen bonding interactions, resulting in the formation of a close packed twofold 2D→2D parallel interpenetrated network for 1, while the extended, non-interpenetrated structure of 2 contains aligned one-dimensional solvent channels. After solvent exchange and evacuation, compound 2 was found to adsorb approximately 35 cm3(STP)/g of CO2 at atmospheric pressure at 273K, with a zero-loading enthalpy of adsorption of -33 kJ/mol, while adsorbing only minimal quantities of N2. These findings are a rare example of conformer-dependent porosity in otherwise geometrically similar frameworks and highlight the importance of understanding weak and fluxional secondary interactions in framework and ligand design.