Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 3(77), p. 381-389.e1, 2013

DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.027

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.

Journal article published in 2012 by Alberto Herreros de-Tejada, Luisa de-Castro, M. de la Vega Prieto, C. Álvarez, Yanira González-Méndez, Rodrigo Jover, José C. Marín Gabriel, Servando Fernández-Díez, Pablo Vega-Villaamil, Pedro Zapater ORCID, F. Gonzalez Rubio, A. Moya Calvo, M. Polo Tomas, Eduardo Polanía, M. P. Roncales and other authors.
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) has become the most important quality indicator for colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate which modifiable factors, directly related to the endoscopic procedure, influenced the ADR in screening colonoscopies. DESIGN: Observational, nested study. SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trials. PATIENTS: Asymptomatic people aged 50 to 69 years were eligible for a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial designed to compare colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal cancer screening. A total of 4539 individuals undergoing a direct screening colonoscopy were included in this study. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Bowel cleansing, sedation, withdrawal time in normal colonoscopies, and cecal intubation were analyzed as possible predictors of adenoma detection by using logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age and sex, factors independently related to the ADR were a mean withdrawal time longer than 8 minutes (odds ratio [OR] 1.51; 95% CI, 1.17-1.96) in normal colonoscopies and split preparation (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.57). For advanced adenomas, only withdrawal time maintained statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. For proximal adenomas, withdrawal time and cecal intubation maintained independent statistical significance, whereas only withdrawal time longer than 8 minutes and a <10-hour period between the end of preparation and colonoscopy showed independent associations for distal adenomas. LIMITATIONS: Only endoscopic variables have been analyzed. CONCLUSION: Withdrawal time was the only modifiable factor related to the ADR in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies associated with an increased detection rate of overall, advanced, proximal, and distal adenomas.