Published in

American Psychological Association, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(14), p. 143-150, 2010

DOI: 10.1037/a0017970

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

“If you wrong us, shall we not revenge?” Social identity salience moderates support for retaliation in response to collective threat

Journal article published in 2010 by Peter Fischer, S. Alexander Haslam, S. Alexander Haslam ORCID, Laura Smith
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Researchers have recently asserted that social identity salience moderates the way in which people react to external stressors. However, previous research has mainly investigated this idea in the context of internal coping processes in response to personal threat. The present research examines people's willingness to respond to collective threat by means of aggressive acts of revenge. A study with 80 female participants revealed that aggressive revenge intentions were most pronounced when the form of collective threat was relevant to a currently salient social identity. Specifically, we found that a threat to national identity (the 7/7/2005 London bombings) led to greater aggression and greater support for revenge when national rather than gender identity was salient. In contrast, a threat to gender identity (Taliban misogyny) led to greater aggression and greater support for revenge when gender rather than national identity was salient. Implications for research on social identity, stress, and responses to terrorism are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)