Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Cold Regions Engineering, 4(25), p. 162-181, 2011

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cr.1943-5495.0000031

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Classification and comparison of snow fences for the protection of transport infrastructures

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Blowing snow or sand transport generates serious problems, such as transport infrastructures buried under snow or sand, in many parts of the world. Some of the most important problems that snow and sand storms can cause include drivers trapped on the roads, indefinite traffic delays, accidents, and isolated populations. Snow fences provide a solution to this problem because they hold back the snow, preventing displacement and wind-induced drifting. In this way, they reduce these problems on transport infrastructures and improve visibility, providing safer driving conditions. In this review, a classification is proposed of snow fences into three basic types: earth, structural, and living snow fences. Among the structural fences, nonporous and porous snow fences are distinguished. The different possibilities in terms of the placement of snow fences are also analyzed. Finally, different types of snow fences have been compared under design, construction, and operation criteria. This review can provide initial guidelines for technicians to choose the best snow fence for blizzard conditions. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000031. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.