Published in

SAGE Publications, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(59), p. 1725-1744, 2006

DOI: 10.1080/17470210500438361

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Differences in the types of musical regularity learnt in incidental- and intentional-learning conditions

Journal article published in 2006 by Gustav Kuhn, Zoltán Dienes ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Several studies have found learning of biconditional grammars only under intentional rule-search conditions (e.g., Johnstone & Shanks, 2001). Memorization of strings merely led to the learning of chunks. We used a musical grammar, a diatonic inversion, that is a type of biconditional grammar. Participants either were required to memorize a set of grammatical tunes (incidental learning), or were asked to search for the underlying rule whilst being given feedback about their performance (intentional learning). The results showed that participants in the incidental-learning condition did not learn the inversion rule and merely acquired explicit knowledge about chunks. However, participants in the intentional-learning condition learnt both the inversion rule and chunks.