Published in

Elsevier, American Journal of Cardiology, 8(112), p. 1246-1251

DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.080

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Early identification of cardiovascular involvement in patients with β-thalassemia major

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate left ventricular myocardial deformation and carotid arterial stiffness using 2-dimensional strain and echo-tracking in patients with asymptomatic β-thalassemia major (β-TM) without significant myocardial iron overload to determine whether early subclinical cardiovascular abnormalities would be detectable. We enrolled 32 patients with β-TM (23 women, mean age 35 ± 8 years) and 33 healthy volunteers (20 women, mean age 35 ± 6 years). All subjects underwent echocardiography with 2-dimensional strain analysis (XStrain) and ultrasonography of the carotid arteries with measurement of the stiffness parameters (ProSound Alpha 10). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using a T2* algorithm (37.7 ± 5.6 ms) for the assessment of myocardial iron overload was performed in each patient. The clinical and standard echocardiographic parameters were comparable between the patients and healthy subjects. The global left ventricular longitudinal strain was significantly impaired in the patients compared with the controls (-17.9 ± 3.5% vs -24.3 ± 3.4%, p = 0.002), although the radial and circumferential strain values were similar between the 2 groups (p = NS for both). The carotid intima-media thickness was comparable between the patients and healthy subjects (0.67 ± 0.20 mm vs 0.66 ± 0.15 mm, p = NS). In contrast, the arterial stiffness was significantly increased in the patients compared with the controls (stiffness index 6.16 ± 1.31 vs 4.65 ± 0.82, p