Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Low adherence of General Practitioners to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for the management of hyperlipidaemia.

Journal article published in 2000 by P. Fornengo, G. Bruno ORCID, A. De Salvia, R. Arcari, E. Pisu, G. Pagano
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

Aim of our study was to assess adherence to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult-Treatment Panel II (NCEP-ATP II) in patients cared for by General Practitioners (GPs) in an Italian community. The design of the work was cross-sectional cohort study; the base was an unselected cohort of 1,168 patients cared for by GPs and screened at our lipid clinic in 1994-1995 in the Province of Turin (Italy). Blood samples were collected after 12-hr fast to measure plasma levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, glucose and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). LDL-cholesterol was calculated using Friedewald's formula. In patients with body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, an oral glucose tolerance test was performed. Blood pressure was measured in all patients, and a baseline ECG or a stress test was performed in those with unknown cardiovascular disease (CVD), then they were classified following the NCEP-ATP II criteria. Primary hyperlipidaemia accounted for 86.9% of the cohort with most patients requiring pharmacological treatment; in 34.4% of the patients, LDL-cholesterol values were > or = 6.46 mmol/l (250 mg/dl) and in 23.7% with established CVD, LDL-cholesterol levels were > or = 5.68 mmol/l (220 mg/dl). In only 7.3% of patients the NCEP treatment goals were achieved, with 1.3% among those in secondary prevention. We observed great discrepancies between clinical practice and international recommendations for the management of hyperlipidaemia.