Published in

Elsevier, Placenta, 5(30), p. 379-390

DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.02.005

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The basic and clinical science of twin-twin transfusion syndrome

Journal article published in 2009 by N. M. Fisk ORCID, G. J. Duncombe, M. H. F. Sullivan
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) is a fascinating condition in which fetuses of identical genotype adopt discordant cardiovascular phenotypes, secondary to unbalanced placental inter-twin transfusion. Flow along the primary units of inter-twin transfusion, unidirectional arteriovenous anastomoses, can be as high as litres/day each, and TTTS develops when the placenta has insufficient compensatory counter-transfusional anastomoses. The initial phenotype reflects dysvolaemia, with added contributions from uteroplacental insufficiency in the donor, and raised afterload with diastolic dysfunction secondary to discordant endothelin and placentally derived renin–angiotensin system effectors in the recipient. Endoscopic laser ablation of placental anastomoses has become the primary treatment modality, supported by a randomised trial showing improved survival and short but not long-term neurological morbidity. Its uptake has facilitated comparative pre- and post-laser studies, which provide considerable insight into the pathophysiology. Despite the therapeutic advance, placental laser remains associated with a 25% incidence of fetal death within a week, and a 10% risk each of recurrence and twin anaemia/polycythaemia sequence due to residual anastomoses. In Stage I, high rates of non-progression with more conservative management have resulted in therapeutic equipoise as to whether laser is indicated primarily or only for progressive disease. The challenge ahead lies in improving double intact survival rates, which in addition to randomised trials will require technical advances, better understanding of the circulatory pathophysiology and more sophisticated surveillance tools.