Published in

Elsevier, European Journal of Cancer, 13(47), p. 2023-2032

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.002

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Better survival in patients with metastasised kidney cancer after nephrectomy: a population-based study in the Netherlands

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AIM: Cytoreductive nephrectomy is considered beneficial in patients with metastasised kidney cancer but only a minority of these patients undergo cytoreductive surgery. Factors associated with nephrectomy and the independent effect of nephrectomy on survival were evaluated in this study. METHODS: Patients were selected from the population-based cancer registry and detailed data were retrieved from clinical files. Factors associated with nephrectomy were evaluated by logistic regression analyses. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with survival; a propensity score reflecting the probability of being treated surgically was included in order to adjust for confounding by indication. RESULTS: 37.5% of 328 patients diagnosed with metastatic kidney cancer between 1999 and 2005 underwent nephrectomy. Patients with a low performance score, high age, >/=2 comorbid conditions, >/=2 metastases, low or high BMI, weight loss, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, elevated alkaline phosphatase, female gender and liver or bone metastases were less likely to be treated surgically. Three year survival was 25% and 4% for patients with and without nephrectomy, respectively (p