Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 6(49), p. 1046, 1995

DOI: 10.2307/2410430

Wiley, Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 6(49), p. 1046-1054, 1995

DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04432.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effective population size in a continuously distributed population

Journal article published in 1995 by Masakado Kawata ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

An individual-based simulation model was created to examine genetic variability, time until fixation and spatial genetic structure in a continuously distributed population. Previous mathematical models for continuously distributed populations have the difficulty that the assumption of independent reproduction and independent dispersal of offspring cause clumped spatial distribution and thus violate an assumption of random spatial distribution. In this study, this problem is avoided by considering the dispersal behavior of offspring. The simulation results showed that the inbreeding effective population size estimated by the rate of decrease of heterozygosity during the first 15 generations corresponds to the neighborhood size calculated by the standard deviation of the dispersal distance (sigma(T)). This inbreeding effective population size does not greatly change with the area of simulation when the densities and sigma(T) are the same. However, the inbreeding effective population size estimated by heterozygosity using the first 500 generations is larger than the neighborhood size calculated by the dispersal distance and increases with the area of simulation with the same densities. The variance effective population size, estimated by time until fixation of alleles, increases with dispersal distance (sigma(T)) and with the area of simulation given the same densities. The inbreeding effective population size and variance effective population size were smaller than the actual population size unless sigma(T) is sufficiently large (2 sigma(T) > approximate L/2, where L is a side of the simulation square).