Published in

Elsevier, Journal of Affective Disorders, 1-2(121), p. 180-183

DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.008

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Who is MADD? Mixed anxiety depressive disorder in the general population

Journal article published in 2010 by Jan Spijker, Neeltje M. Batelaan ORCID, Ron de Graaf, R. de Graaf, Pim Cuijpers ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic criteria for (subthreshold) mixed anxiety depression (MADD) were proposed in DSM-IV. Yet the usefulness of this classification is questioned. We therefore assessed the prevalence of MADD, and investigated whether MADD adds to separate classifications Of pure subthreshold depression and anxiety. Method: Data of the Netherlands Mental Health and Incidence Study were used. Results: The 12-month prevalence of MADD was 0.6%. Between the three subthreshold categories few differences were found with regard to socio-demographic Variables, care utilisation and functioning. Course in MADD seems more favourable and MADD is not a stable diagnosis over time. Limitations: The MADD Criteria used in the present study differed slightly from the proposed criteria in DSM-IV and sample sizes were small. Conclusions: Given these results, MADD is not a relevant diagnosis in terms of prevalence and consequences when classified according to the Currently proposed criteria.