Published in

Elsevier, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 2(91), p. 176-182

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.02.007

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Investigation of the complex I assembly chaperones B17.2L and NDUFAF1 in a cohort of CI deficient patients.

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Dysfunction of complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase; CI), the largest enzyme of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system, often results in severe neuromuscular disorders and early childhood death. Mutations in its seven mitochondrial and 38 nuclear DNA-encoded structural components can only partly explain these deficiencies. Recently, CI assembly chaperones NDUFAF1 and B17.2L were linked to CI deficiency, but it is still unclear by which mechanism. To better understand their requirement during assembly we have studied their presence in CI subcomplexes in a cohort of CI deficient patients using one- and two-dimensional blue-native PAGE. This analysis revealed distinct differences between their associations to subcomplexes in different patients. B17.2L occurred in a 830 kDa subcomplex specifically in patients with mutations in subunits NDUFV1 and NDUFS4. Contrasting with this seemingly specific requirement, the previously described NDUFAF1 association to 500-850 kDa intermediates did not appear to be related to the nature and severity of the CI assembly defect. Surprisingly, even in the absence of assembly intermediates in a patient harboring a mutation in translation elongation factor G1 (EFG1), NDUFAF1 remained associated to the 500-850 kDa subcomplexes. These findings illustrate the difference in mechanism between B17.2L and NDUFAF1 and suggest that the involvement of NDUFAF1 in the assembly process could be indirect rather than direct via the binding to assembly intermediates.