Published in

Taylor and Francis Group, Economic Systems Research, 3(26), p. 327-353, 2014

DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2014.939949

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparing the Gtap-Mrio and Wiod Databases for Carbon Footprint Analysis

Journal article published in 2014 by Iñaki Arto, José M. Rueda-Cantuche, Glen Philip Peters ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This is a submitted manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Economic Systems Research on 04 Aug 2014, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09535314.2014.939949 ; We explore two different worldwide multi-regional input–output (MRIO) databases (Global Trade Analysis Project-MRIO and World Input–Output Database) for the calculation of the global carbon footprint (CF) of nations. We start our analysis with a description of the main characteristics of the databases and then make a comparison between their main components. Then, we calculate the CF with both databases and identify (from a global perspective) the most relevant factors underlying their differences using structural decomposition analysis. On average, certain parts of both databases (e.g. intermediate uses and final demand) can be said to be similar for around 75% to 80%, with only a few elements in each part mainly driving the major differences. The divergences in the datasets of four countries explain almost 50% of the differences in the CF (the USA, China, Russia and India). Industry-wise, 50% of the differences can be explained by the divergences in electricity, refining and inland transport industries. ; submittedVersion