Published in

Springer Verlag, Oecologia, 2(174), p. 559-566

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2775-8

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect : a modeling approach

Journal article published in 2013 by Pedro Flombaum, Osvaldo E. Sala ORCID, Edward B. Rastetter ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Author Posting. © The Author(s), 2013. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Springer for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Oecologia 174 (2014): 559-566, doi:10.1007/s00442-013-2775-8. ; Resource partitioning, facilitation, and sampling effect are the three mechanisms behind the biodiversity effect, which is depicted usually as the effect of plant-species richness on aboveground net primary production. These mechanisms operate simultaneously but their relative importance and interactions are difficult to unravel experimentally. Thus, niche differentiation and facilitation have been lumped together and separated from the sampling effect. Here, we propose three hypotheses about interactions among the three mechanisms and test them using a simulation model. The model simulated water movement through soil and vegetation, and net primary production mimicking the Patagonian steppe. Using the model, we created grass and shrub monocultures and mixtures, controlled root overlap and grass water-use efficiency (WUE) to simulate gradients of biodiversity, resource partitioning and facilitation. The presence of shrubs facilitated grass growth by increasing its WUE and in turn increased the sampling effect whereas root overlap (resource partitioning) had, on average, no effect on sampling effect. Interestingly, resource partitioning and facilitation interacted so the effect of facilitation on sampling effect decreased as resource partitioning increased. Sampling effect was enhanced by the difference between the two functional groups in their efficiency in using resources. Morphological and physiological differences make one group outperform the other, once those differences were established further differences did not enhance the sampling effect. In addition, grass WUE and root overlap positively influence the biodiversity effect but showed no interactions. ; This study was supported by US National Science Foundation DEB 0917668, DEB 1235828, National Academies Keck Futures Initiative 025512, Arizona State University, Marine Biological Lab, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (PIP 11420100100074), and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 1-1-0106). ; 2014-09-25