Published in

American Astronomical Society, Astronomical Journal, 1(119), p. 119-125, 2000

DOI: 10.1086/301180

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A Possible 100-day X-ray-to-Optical Lag in the Variations of the Seyfert 1 Nucleus NGC 3516

Journal article published in 1999 by Dan Maoz, Rick Edelson ORCID, Kirpal Nandra
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We present optical broadband (B and R) observations of the Seyfert 1 nucleus NGC 3516, obtained at Wise Observatory from 1997 March to 1998 September, contemporaneously with the X-ray 2-10 keV measurements of RXTE. The cross correlation function shows a positive peak when the optical variations lead the X-rays by about 100 days. We show that the putative correlation signal at 100 days is entirely due to the slow ($\gtorder 30$ days) components of the light curves. During the first year or this monitoring, smoothed versions of the light curves are nearly identical copies of each other, but scaled in amplitude and shifted in time. However, for the next 200 days, the X-ray and optical variations are clearly different. During the whole period, the faster-changing components of the light curves are uncorrelated at any lag. The detection of this lag is tentative and the significance of the correlation uncertain. If the 100-day delay is real, however, one interpretation is that that the slowly-varying part of the X-ray emission is an echo of the optical emission, Compton scattered from a medium located about 50-100 lt days from the optical source. We point out that a possibly analogous phenomenon, of a lag between hard and soft X-rays for a given variability timescale, exists in Galactic stellar-mass accretors. Remarkably, in both cases the lag corresponds to a light travel distance of order $10^4$ gravitational radii. Alternatively, the lag may not represent a physical size, but for example, the timescale of an instability propagating inward in an accretion flow, appearing first in the optical and then in the X-rays. In any event, there is no strong correlation at zero, or small positive, lag, ruling out an energetically-significant X-ray reprocessed component in the optical emission. Comment: To appear in AJ, January 2000 issue. AAS LaTex, 14 pages, 6 figures