Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 3(49), p. 323-335, 2009

DOI: 10.1177/0091270008329560

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Trial treatment length optimization with an emphasis on disease progression studies

Journal article published in 2009 by Stefanie Hennig ORCID, Joakim Nyberg, Andrew C. Hooker, Mats O. Karlsson
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Optimal design has been used in the past mainly to optimize sampling schedules for clinical trials. Optimization on design variables other than sampling times has been published in the literature only once before. This study shows, as an example, optimization on the length of treatment periods to obtain reliable estimates of drug effects on longterm disease progression studies. Disease progression studies are high in cost, effort, and time; therefore, optimization of treatment length is highly recommended to avoid failure or loss of information. Results are provided for different drug effects (eg, protective and symptomatic) and for different lengths of studies and sampling schedules. The merits of extending the total study length versus inclusion of more samples per participants are investigated. The authors demonstrate that if no observations are taken during the washout period, a trial can lose up to 40% of its efficiency. Furthermore, when optimization of treatment length is performed using multiple possible drug effect models simultaneously, these studies show high power in discriminating between different drug effect models.