Published in

American Psychological Association, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(41), p. 6-10, 2015

DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000024

Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Journal of Vision, 12(15), p. 887

DOI: 10.1167/15.12.887

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Object substitution masking for an attended and foveated target

Journal article published in 2015 by Hannah L. Filmer ORCID, Jason B. Mattingley ORCID, Paul E. Dux ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A central assumption of models proposed to explain object substitution masking (OSM) is that the phenomenon arises only when attention is distributed across several possible target locations. However, recent work has questioned the role of attention in OSM, suggesting instead that ceiling effects might explain the apparent interaction between spatial attention and masking. Here the authors report definitive evidence that OSM does not depend upon attention being distributed over space or time. In 2 experiments, they demonstrate reliable OSM for constant, foveal presentations of a single target stimulus. Crucially, in their design participants' attention was always focused on the target, thus discounting the hypothesis that a key requirement for OSM is distributed attention. The findings challenge how OSM is conceptualized in the broader masking literature and have important implications for theories of visual processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).