Published in

Elsevier, Cancer Detection and Prevention, 3(29), p. 267-275, 2005

DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2004.06.007

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Community perceptions of suspicious pigmented skin lesions: are they accurate when compared to general practitioners?

Journal article published in 2005 by Pd Baade, Kp Balanda ORCID, Wr Stanton, Jb Lowe, Cb Del Mar
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Community responses (n = 925, response rate = 71%) of a series of eight photographs of pigmented skin lesions were compared against those of general practitioners (n = 114, response rate = 77%), considered to be the most relevant gold standard. The eight photographs included three melanomas, two potentially malignant lesions and three benign pigmented lesions. Over the pool of lesions examined, the average probability that community members thought a lesion was likely to be skin cancer (0.68 [99% CI = 0.66-0.69]) was higher (p