Published in

Australasian Medical Publishing Company Ltd, Medical Journal of Australia, 8(155), p. 576-576, 1991

DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1991.tb93914.x

Elsevier, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1(55), p. 129-130, 2010

DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.08.016

Elsevier, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 5(70), p. 752-753

DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.016

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

In reply

Journal article published in 1991 by Geoffrey K. Isbister ORCID, James Isbister
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

I thank Lugassy et al for their interest in our study. However, they provide poor reasoning for citalopram overdoses requiring prolonged monitoring. Although the metabolite didesmethylcitalopram has been associated with cardiac toxicity in dogs, this has not been shown in humans and Lugassy et al confirm this in the case they reference where only citalopram and desmethylcitalopram were detected. In a full pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of citalopram in overdose there was a delay in peak QT prolongation compared to peak drug concentrations. However, simulations based on the model showed that after 13 hours the chance of an abnormal QT occurring in a patient with a normal QT was less than 1%. In the single case reported by Tarabar et al2 the patient had QT prolongation on admission which does not support the case for delayed QT prolongation, as it is quite possible that she simply survived with QT prolongation for over 24 hours prior to presentation.