Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Seeds: biology, development and ecology. Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Seeds, Brisbane, Australia, May 2005, p. 225-234

DOI: 10.1079/9781845931971.0225

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Differences in the Lolium rigidum embryo proteome of seeds with a high (light-insensitive) and low (light-sensitive) level of dormancy

Proceedings article published in 2007 by Kj J. Steadman ORCID, Ah H. Millar
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

A preliminary study of changes in the proteome of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) seeds during dormancy release is described in this chapter. Highly dormant seeds (i.e. light-insensitive, unable to germinate under light or dark conditions) were prepared by stratification in darkness at 20 C for 2 days. Seeds with a low level of dormancy (i.e. fight-sensitive, able to germinate under fight but not dark conditions) were prepared by stratification in darkness at 20 degrees C for 35 days. 2D gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) was performed using excised embryos. Only six proteins were found to differ in abundance between light-insensitive and fight-sensitive embryos. Spots I and 2 were too low to be analysed in light-insensitive embryos but were present in fight-sensitive embryos, representing at least a 20-fold induction. Spots 3 and 4 were three- to fivefold more abundant in fight-insensitive compared with fight-sensitive embryos. Spots 5 and 6 were more abundant in light-sensitive embryo samples, but this difference was less than twofold. The six protein spots of interest were excised from the gels, digested with trypsin and analysed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Spots 1 and 2 gave significant matches with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenases (GAPDH). Spot 4 could not be matched either against the NCBInr Viridiplantae (Green Plants) or a translation of the Lolium gene index from The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR). De novo sequencing of two peptides was performed, but matching of these sequences to Lolium or total plant protein data-sets with the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) has been unsuccessful. Data from spots 3, 5 and 6 were not sufficient to allow partern matching identification, or successful de novo sequencing analysis, and remain unidentified.