Published in

Elsevier, European Journal of Cancer, 13(48), p. 1997-2003

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.01.030

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Successful centralisation of patients with vulvar carcinoma: A population-based study in The Netherlands.

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In general, centralisation of care for patients with rare malignancies is advised in order to improve outcome with respect to prognosis and treatment related morbidity. Therefore, centralisation of women with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which is an extremely rare tumour, has been advocated by the national guidelines of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in 2000. The objective of this study was to determine whether this advice has been adapted and has led to improved survival. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with vulvar malignancies between 1989 and 2008 in the Eastern part of the Netherlands were retrieved from the population-based cancer registry held by the Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The Netherlands. Patient- and tumour characteristics and vital status until January 2011 were retrieved. Data of patients diagnosed in two periods (before and after release of the guideline; 1989-1999 and 2000-2008) were compared. Relative survival rates were calculated as a good approximation of cause-specific survival. RESULTS: A total number of 382 patients with vulvar SCC with invasion >1mm, who had an indication for groin surgery, were included in the analysis. In the first decade 62% (123 of 198 patients) were treated in a specialised oncology centre, which increased to 93% (172 of 184 patients) in the more recent period. Overall, the 5year relative survival improved slightly from 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 60-77%) to 75% (95% CI 65-83%). After adjustment for age and stage, being treated in a specialised oncology centre was an independent prognostic factor for survival. CONCLUSION: Centralisation of care for vulvar SCC patients has been well adopted in the Eastern part of the Netherlands. Being treated in a specialised oncology centre was associated with a better survival after adjustment for age and stage.