Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 3(26), p. 245-251, 2014

DOI: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000057

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Established and forthcoming drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis

Journal article published in 2013 by Willem F. Lems, Piet Geusens, M. den Heijer, M. den Heijer ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Nowadays, effective drugs are available to prevent fractures in patients at high risk for osteoporotic fractures. The generic bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first choice, because of their effectiveness and tolerability in the majority of patients, while they also have a low cost price. However, the use of bisphosphonates can be associated with side effects: not only the well-known (upper) gastrointestinal side effects, but also (spontaneous) atypical fractures of the femur and aseptic necrosis of the jaw. Denosumab and zoledronic acid are both potent antiresorptive drugs that could be an attractive alternative for those patients who do not tolerate oral bisphosphonates. Strontium ranelate has both antiresorptive and anabolic effects, while teriparatide has primarily anabolic effects. The working mechanism of cathepsin K inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies against sclerostin, both currently under development, is exciting since the usually occurring coupling of bone resorption and bone formation has not been found so far.