Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1(66), p. 219-226, 2011

DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22774

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced CT biomarkers in bladder cancer

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is frequently used to provide response biomarkers in clinical trials of novel cancer therapeutics but assessment of their physiological accuracy is difficult. DCE-CT provides an independent probe of similar pharmacokinetic processes and may be modeled in the same way as DCE-MRI to provide purportedly equivalent physiological parameters. In this study, DCE-MRI and DCE-CT were directly compared in subjects with primary bladder cancer to assess the degree to which the model parameters report modeled physiology rather than artefacts of the measurement technique and to determine the interchangeability of the techniques in a clinical trial setting. The biomarker K(trans) obtained by fitting an extended version of the Kety model voxelwise to both DCE-MRI and DCE-CT data was in excellent agreement (mean across subjects was 0.085 ± 0.030 min(-1) for DCE-MRI and 0.087 ± 0.033 min(-1) for DCE-CT, intermodality coefficient of variation 9%). The parameter v(p) derived from DCE-CT was significantly greater than that derived from DCE-MRI (0.018 ± 0.006 compared to 0.009 ± 0.008, P = 0.0007) and v(e) was in reasonable agreement only for low values. The study provides evidence that the biomarker K(trans) is a robust parameter indicative of the underlying physiology and relatively independent of the method of measurement. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.