Published in

Elsevier, Surgical Oncology, 4(20), p. e187-e193

DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2011.06.005

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Apronectomy combined with laparotomy for morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients.

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of morbidly (BMI >40) and super obese (BMI >50) women with endometrial cancer is challenging. The aim of this study was to describe the short and long term outcomes of apronectomy combined with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging and tumour debulking. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of morbidly obese patients undergoing combined apronectomy and laparotomy for suspected endometrial cancer between 2007 and 2009 was performed. Short term (operating time, estimated blood loss, complication rates, duration of hospital stay) and long term outcomes (weight profile over 24-month follow up period) were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were identified with a median age of 58 years and a median BMI of 49 (range 37-64). Apronectomy combined with laparotomy took 192 min on average to complete, with a mean estimated blood loss of 497 ml. There were no intra-operative complications. Postoperative complications included anaemia (14% required a blood transfusion), urinary tract infection (5%) and wound complications (wound infection in 29% and partial wound dehiscence in 5%). The median post-operative stay was 9 days. At twenty-four months, one-third of patients were heavier (mean 5 kg, range 2-8 kg) but almost two-thirds of patients were considerably lighter than they had been pre-operatively (mean 13 kg lighter, range 9-17 kg). CONCLUSIONS: Apronectomy combined with laparotomy was safe and well tolerated in this group of patients. Sustained weight loss by two-thirds of the patients over the two-year follow up period may reflect lifestyle changes instigated by individual patients following surgery. Combined apronectomy and laparotomy may provide an alternative to standard surgery for this challenging group of patients.