Published in

Elsevier, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 6(37), p. 884-891, 2011

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.03.008

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A comparative evaluation of sonomyography, electromyography, force, and wrist angle in a discrete tracking task

Journal article published in 2011 by Jy Guo, Yp Zheng ORCID, Lpj Kenney, Audrey Bowen, David Howard, Jiri Jj Canderle
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We have previously used the real-time change of muscle thickness detected using ultrasound, namely sonomyography (SMG), for prosthesis motor control purposes. In the present study, we further compared subjects’ performance using SMG and surface electromyography (EMG) in a series of discrete tracking tasks, both with and without a concurrent auditory attention task. Sixteen healthy subjects used different signals in a random order to control the cursor on a personal computer screen to cancel the letter ‘‘E’’ in a sequence of vertically arranged letters. Subjects’ performance was evaluated under isometric contraction and wrist extension using the extensor carpi radiali muscle. The percentage of successfully cancelled Es using SMG decreased by 21 ± 16% and 17 ± 11% in isometric contraction and wrist extension tests, respectively, compared with the corresponding performances using force and angle signals. The corresponding reduction recorded by using EMG was 40 ± 29% and 41 ± 25%. In addition, there was a significant decrease by using EMG compared with that by SMG (p , 0.001). The results also demonstrated that there was no significant difference of performances of canceling E between the single and dual tasks by using any of the control signals (p . 0.99). Furthermore, the SMG control provided more consistent performances under the single and dual tasks compared with EMG control.