Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2(31), p. 105-108

DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm3102_1

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

External validity: We need to do more

Journal article published in 2006 by Russell E. Glasgow, Lawrence W. Green, Lisa M. Klesges ORCID, David B. Abrams, Edwin B. Fisher, Michael G. Goldstein, Laura L. Hayman, Judith K. Ockene, C. Tracy Orleans
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Upload
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The article discusses the implications of two health research trends for improving the design, review and reporting of research and evaluation studies in the U.S. The first trend is the gap between research findings and application in practice. The other trend is the increased emphasis on the methodological quality of health research reports.