Published in

Nature Research (part of Springer Nature), Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 5(10), p. 284-294

DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.197

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The safety of biologic therapies in RA-associated interstitial lung disease.

Journal article published in 2013 by Meghna Jani ORCID, Nik Hirani, Eric L. Matteson, William G. Dixon
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common extra-articular manifestation associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Early case reports of serious respiratory adverse events (SRAEs) following treatment with anti-TNF agents have led to concerns about biologic therapy in patients with RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD), and a tendency for biologic agents targeting factors other than TNF to be prescribed in such patients. At present, the appropriateness of such decisions is not clear. Given that the therapeutic goal for RA is remission, clinicians increasingly face the challenge of choosing the optimal biologic agent in patients with RA-ILD and uncontrolled joint disease. However, no evidence-based guidelines exist to guide physicians in deciding whether to commence biologic therapy in this setting, or in selecting which drug is most appropriate. Herein, we review the evidence for the comparative pulmonary safety of anti-TNF agents and non-TNF-targeting biologic agents in RA-ILD. In addition, we propose a framework for assessment of baseline disease severity to guide treatment decisions, and for monitoring during therapy. Because of substantial gaps in the available evidence, we also describe a research agenda aimed at obtaining data that will help inform future clinical practice.