Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The significance of bent mountain belts .

Journal article published in 2009 by St T. Johnston ORCID, Am M. Monahan, Gabriel Gutiérrez Alonso, Weil
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

Mountain systems, or orogens, result from collisional processes and are commonly curved in plan view. Two main models have been proposed explaining bends of orogens. Thomas (1977, 2006) explained curved mountain systems as reflecting the primary shape of the pre-collisional continental rifted margin. The alternative is that the bends result from deformation of previously more linear orogens, and hence reflect continental and perhaps lithosphere-scale strain. Identifying the processes that might result in the development of such large-scale structures, commonly referred to as oroclines is, however, difficult. Nonetheless, primary explanations of curved mountain belts, including the Cordillera and Appalachians of western and eastern North America, respectively, and the Variscan of Europe, fail to account for much paleomagnetic and paleo-stress data. Resolution of the debate is fundamental to understanding the paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the Earth.