Published in

American Chemical Society, Inorganic Chemistry, 19(35), p. 5595-5602, 1996

DOI: 10.1021/ic951573t

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Solid State Dynamics of Tricarbonyl(η-1,5-cyclohexadienylium)iron tetrafluoroborate and tricarbonyl(η-1,5-cycloheptadienylium)iron tetrafluoroborate

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The dynamic behavior of [(C6H7)Fe(CO)3]BF4 (I) and [(C7H9)Fe(CO)3]BF4 (II) in the solid state has been investigated principally by NMR spectroscopy. High-resolution variable-temperature 1H and 13C NMR spectra indicate that both complexes have a solid state phase transition above which there is rapid reorientation of the cyclodienylium rings and fast exchange of the carbonyl groups. The transition occurs between 253 and 263 K for I and between 329 and 341 K for II. The presence of the phase transition is confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy supports the notion that complex I is highly mobile at room temperature, while II is relatively static. The activation energy for the cyclodienylium group rotation in the high-temperature phase of I is estimated from 1H spin - lattice relaxation time measurements to be 17.5 kJ mol-1. Static 13C NMR measurements of the solid complexes in the high-temperature phase indicate that the 13C chemical shift anisotropies are only 20-30 ppm. This is significantly less than that expected to result from motion of individual groups and thus suggests that rotation of the whole molecule is involved. A single-crystal X-ray structural determination of complex II, at 295 K, showed that the complex is tetragonal (space group P41, a = 10.610(1) Å, c = 21.761(3) Å, V = 2449.7(5) Å3, ρcalc = 1.734 g cm-3), with eight cycloheptadienyl cations and eight tetrafluoroborate anions per unit cell. In addition, powder X-ray diffraction studies of both I and II confirm that at low temperatures both complexes have a tetragonal unit cell, which transforms to a cubic unit cell above the phase transition. The powder patterns, recorded above the phase transition, support the proposal that the complexes are undergoing whole-molecule tumbling in their dynamic regimes.