Published in

Wiley, Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics, 10(119), p. 8637-8647, 2014

DOI: 10.1002/2014ja020484

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

What is the appropriate coordinate system for magnetometer data when analyzing ionospheric currents?

Journal article published in 2014 by Karl Magnus Laundal ORCID, Jesper Gjerl, J. W. Gjerloev
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In this paper we investigate which coordinate representation is most appropriate when analyzing ground magnetometer data in terms of ionospheric currents, in particular the westward electrojet. The AL and the recently introduced SML index are frequently used as monitors of the westward electrojet. Both indices are based on ground magnetometers at auroral latitudes. From these magnetometers, the largest perturbation in the southward direction is selected as the AL/SML index at 1 minute cadence. The southward component is defined as antiparallel to the orientation of the horizontal part of the Earths’ main field, B0,H. The implicit assumption when using these indices as a monitor of the westward electrojet is that the electrojet flows perpendicular to B0,H. However, B0,H is in general not perpendicular to the westward direction in coordinate systems that take non-dipole terms of the Earth's magnetic field into account, such as Apex and the Altitude Adjusted Corrected Geomagnetic (AACGM) coordinate systems. In this paper we derive a new SML index, based on Apex coordinates. We find that the new index has less variation with longitude and universal time (UT), compared to the traditionally defined SML. We argue that when analyzing ionospheric currents using magnetometers, it is appropriate to convert the components to a corrected geomagnetic system. This is most important when considering longitudinal or UT variations, or when data from a limited region is used.