Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, 4(2), p. 1-26, 2024

DOI: 10.1145/3677135

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

GABoost: Graph Alignment Boosting via Local Optimum Escape

Journal article published in 2024 by Wei Liu ORCID, Wei Zhang ORCID, Haiyan Zhao ORCID, Zhi Jin ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Heterogeneous graphs provide a universal data structure for representing various kinds of structured data in numerous domains. The graph alignment problem aims to find the correspondences of vertices in different graphs, playing a fundamental role in many downstream tasks of heterogeneous graph mining. In recent years, many graph alignment methods have been proposed, ranging from classical optimization methods , spectral methods , to embedding learning based-methods . Due to the problem's complexity, the result found by most existing methods is either a heuristic solution or a critical point in the solution space. In this paper, we propose GABoost, a graph alignment boosting algorithm that takes as input an initial alignment between two heterogeneous graphs and outputs a boosted alignment via an iterative local-optimum-escape process. One of the distinctive features of GABoost is that it can be sequentially composed with any graph alignment methods to improve the output of upstream methods. To examine the effectiveness of GABoost, we select 7 upstream methods of graph alignment as well as 6 real-world datasets, and quantitatively investigate the degree to which GABoost boosts these methods. The results show that GABoost improves the alignment accuracy of the 7 upstream methods by 25.25% on average with acceptable time overhead.