Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

BMJ Publishing Group, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, p. ijgc-2024-005815, 2024

DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005815

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Tumor-intrinsic chemosensitivity assessed by KELIM and prognosis byBRCAstatus in patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ObjectiveTreatment of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas relies on surgery and chemotherapy, potentially followed by bevacizumab and/or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM) is a pragmatic indicator of tumor primary chemosensitivity. Although it is well established thatBRCAmutations are associated with platinum sensitivity, the relationship betweenBRCAstatus and KELIM score has yet to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the interactions betweenBRCAand KELIM, and their respective prognostic values.MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from 743 patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas included in a French nationwide registry (NCT03275298) treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by surgery. We analyzed the interactions betweenBRCAand KELIM, and their impacts on progression-free survival and overall survival.ResultsBRCA-mutated(BRCAm) patients had higher standardized KELIM thanBRCA-wild type (BRCAwt) tumors (median 1.16 vs 1.06, respectively; p=0.001). The prognostic value of the KELIM score was independent ofBRCAin multivariate analyses. KELIM score andBRCAcould be combined to define three prognostic groups: (1) an unfavorable prognostic group with bothBRCAwt and unfavorable KELIM (median progression-free survival 12.0 months); (2) an intermediate prognostic group with eitherBRCAm and unfavorable KELIM, orBRCAwt and favorable KELIM (median progression-free survival of 16.0 and 18.8 months, respectively; HR 0.64 compared with the unfavorable group, p<0.001); and (3) a favorable prognostic group with bothBRCAm and favorable KELIM (median progression-free survival 28.8 months; HR 0.37 compared with the unfavorable group, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe KELIM score provides complementary prognostic information with respect toBRCA,and discriminates different prognoses withinBRCAm orBRCAwt patients. Patients with bothBRCAwt/unfavorable KELIM have a poor prognosis, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies.